Skip to main content

Brief 2: Supermarket Tabloids

The Power of Tabloids: The National Examiner.

Everyone has seen them while checking out at the store. "FBI Captures Bat Child," "Obama hid his Gay Lifestyle to be President," these are the headlines that line the check out counter next to the chewing gum and the Yu-Gi-Oh! cards. As a child, I would ask whoever I was at the store with about the headlines and if they were true. "Did they really find Tupac in Cuba with Elvis," is something I would've probably asked.

I'd like to think that this begs the question, "how much power do tabloids have?" I'm willing to bet the answer is, "a lot." Before taking a deep dive into the wondrous world of tabloid journalism, I can't help but to compare tabloid journalism to the 'Bias in Cable News' assignment, wherein the effort of outdoing competitors leads to a lack of credibility, but in a different sense as tabloid journalism is universally distrusted.

Whenever I think of a tabloid magazine, I think of The National Enquirer or The Sun, but I've decided to do my brief over a less popular tabloid, but one that everyone will recognize: The National Examiner.

The Examiner is the least expensive tabloid in America, containing the fewest pages in American Media's portfolio. The tabloid is targeted at older audiences, often featuring older or deceased celebrities in order to garner attention. Other than the catchy headlines, the magazine features articles often pertaining to daytime television reviews, as well as advertisements featuring products for the older generation.

Just like the younger generation, you could make an argument that the older generation is susceptible to being fooled by tabloids such as The Examiner. For those who may argue that age brings wisdom and no one in the right mind would believe tabloid headlines, I would draw the comparison of tabloid journalism to televangelists and their dubious money-making ways, stemming mostly from the older generation.

Something interesting I found about The National Examiner is that it has no website. Unlike it's sister magazine, The National Enquirer, The National Examiner is solely a paper-based publication.

I would be lying if I said I never looked at the magazines while checking out, then putting them back when it was my turn in line. I get a laugh from the dramatic and overly-saturated covers, but I've never really considered them to be true. On the other hand, there is always some truth behind the cover.

Maybe I'll take a closer look at the magazines next time I take a trip to the store.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brief 7: Exploiting a News Story

Movies and taking advantage of news and popular culture. Movies are one of my favorite things. They allow for unique stories to be told in interesting ways. Major franchises and public domain titles can be told differently with new direction behind the camera, allowing for major changes in the exact same concept of film. I consider myself a big film critic; my standards for movies are very high thanks to the contributions of brilliant directors such as Quentin Tarantino, Martin Scorsese, Steven Spielberg, Stanley Kubrick, and countless others. As someone who watches a lot of movies, you begin to notice a certain trend with how movies are produced and how the popularity of certain news stories and popular cultures can affect the film industry . There are a lot of criteria in which I deem a movie not worth my time or just plain bad, one of which being if it's a pointless movie or a senseless cash-grab. The thing about movies though is that they take years to create and prod...

Brief 1: Bias in Cable News

The War that Everyone Loses: Fox vs CNN. We live in an interesting time; nearly 70% of Americans get at least some of their news from social media according to  The Pew Research Center . Information has never been more available than now. Any query can be answered with a simple search from a device that fits in your pocket. Because of this, the prevalence of news and the means by which it can be found are extended. Information residing online has always been questioned for credibility.  Wikipedia  is one of the most visited websites in the world ( Similar Web ) and contains over ten million pages of articles in dozens of languages. However, Wikipedia is not a trusted source. Wikipedia employs a small, trusted staff of about 300 employees but the website and it's articles can be contributed to and edited by anyone. via  The Independent Every article has citations and is fact checked by staff and other verified contributors. Every change is noted by Wikipe...

Brief 6: Copyright and Fair Use

A frightening world. 'Copyright'. It's a pretty scary word. It's not to be confused with 'copywrite', it's far more serious. The difference between the two words isn't just a couple of letters, it's a lawsuit. Copyright is the legal right, in many countries, that grants the creator of an original work exclusive rights to determine whether, and under what conditions, the work may be used by others. Copyright is especially tricky. You can take all of the necessary precautions but can still bite the bullet when it comes to copyright strikes. A recent source of copyright issues has been from YouTube . YouTube is a video media platform that allows users to upload videos of almost every variety, from vlogs to gaming videos. On such a popular platform, there are bound to copyright infractions. Full movies have been uploaded to YouTube, as well as the monetization of music unowned by the uploader. Certain companies are more proactive in protect...